Factory Automation with industrial robots for palletizing food products like bread and toast at a bakery in Germany, robotics
Photo by KUKA Roboter GmbH, Bachmann on wikimedia

Warehouse Reporting

Warehouse automation readiness

Assess a defined warehouse automation flow through process evidence, data accuracy, demand, safety and fault recovery.

A warehouse is ready to assess automation for a particular process when it can show the problem to solve, provide dependable instructions, compare proposed capacity with work due, and account for orders and stock when equipment stops.

Assessing Warehouse Automation Readiness: Key Steps

  1. Identify the constraintLocate where work first falls behind: picking, replenishment, packing or carrier handover.
  2. Baseline the workRecord picks per hour, pick accuracy, labour cost per unit despatched and throughput at peak.
  3. Check the instructionsVerify item, handling unit, quantity, location and stock status match physical goods.
  4. Match capacity to demandCompare equipment capacity with release intervals, dispatch cut-off and product mix.
  5. Check physical fit and recoveryReview footprint, routes, access for faults, restart procedures and safety compliance.
  6. Record the decisionDocument readiness status with evidence, owners and unresolved assumptions.

Identify the constraint

Locate where work first falls behind: picking, replenishment, packing or carrier handover. Record the delay and the work affected. Faster picking has limited value if packing already determines when orders leave.

Describe the proposed flow using ordinary and busy order periods. Include item sizes, units per line, handling needs and exceptions such as short stock or a changed order. Choose a bounded pilot only after the team can state what improvement it would measure.

Baseline the work

A baseline can include picks per hour, pick accuracy, labour cost per unit despatched and throughput at peak. Record the measures for the defined process before comparing a proposed change. A throughput gain alone will not show whether accuracy or labour cost has changed.

Keep the measure and its unit consistent across the baseline and the assessment. If the proposal is judged on completed work, for example, compare completed work rather than a machine cycle with a different endpoint.

Check the instructions

Compare the item, handling unit, quantity, location and stock status used by the proposed flow with physical goods and positions. A correct warehouse total can still send equipment to an empty bin. Trace a work instruction from the warehouse system to the equipment and its returned result, including a shortage or rejected message.

Microsoft's Dynamics 365 material handling equipment interface illustrates one possible connection: it uses separate outgoing and incoming queues. Confirm the behaviour of the proposed WMS and equipment connection rather than assuming it uses that interface.

For the Dynamics 365 MHAX example, outbound events are created from work lines during work creation or execution. The equipment polls for relevant events, follows the instructions, then sends inbound events such as work line completion or short picking. Confirm that the proposed connection handles the event types the process needs.

MHAX's queue processor processes inbound events immediately. Depending on the inbound data, it may run existing work, modify it or create new work. Assess how each expected response affects open work and stock records.

Microsoft notes that enabling MHAX can involve sharing data with selected third-party services. The organisation controls what data is shared, and use of those services is its responsibility under the terms agreed with the third party. Establish whether this applies to the proposed connection.

Match capacity to demand

Count work by release interval and dispatch cut-off, using the unit the proposed equipment handles. Ask what event a quoted cycle completes and what staffing, replenishment, product mix and stops its rate assumes.

Compare capacity through to a useful result, such as an order line ready for packing, rather than stopping at a machine cycle. Keep forecast growth separate from current demand.

Check physical fit and recovery

Review the footprint, pedestrian and vehicle routes, remaining manual tasks, access for clearing faults and the restart procedure with the site team and supplier. Safe Work Australia publishes a model Code of Practice titled Managing risks of plant in the workplace. Check with the relevant state or territory regulator whether the Code has legal effect locally, and assess the installed equipment and site procedures.

Before live work enters the flow, identify who can stop it, what happens to instructions already issued, and how goods and system records will be reconciled. Define a safe manual route only for work whose identity and physical position can be established.

Record the decision

Readiness questionEvidenceHold when
Is this the constraint?Workload, delays and error recordsThe cause is elsewhere or cannot be measured
Are instructions dependable?Physical checks and a traced messageItem, unit, location or stock state is ambiguous
Can the flow clear work due?Interval demand and conditional end-to-end capacityUnits or assumptions do not match
Can people operate it safely?Site risk review and proceduresAccess or isolation risks remain unresolved
Can work continue after a fault?Stop, manual-route and reconciliation planOpen work or goods cannot be accounted for

Mark each question ready, conditional or on hold, with an owner for missing evidence, stating which assumption or operating condition remains untested and who will confirm it. A small pilot can test a bounded claim using completed correct work and exception effort. Its result applies to the workload and configuration tested.

In this guide

  1. Choosing a warehouse process for a small automation pilotSelect a bounded warehouse automation pilot using a measurable problem, dependable inputs, observable outcomes and safe recovery.
  2. Checking data accuracy before adding automation equipmentCheck the item, unit, location, stock and work fields that will direct a proposed warehouse automation flow.
  3. Comparing automation throughput with actual demandMatch proposed automation output to actual warehouse demand using the same unit, busy interval and complete work path.
  4. Planning manual fallback for automated picking systemsPlan how to stop automated picking, account for work in progress, release manual picks and reconcile before restarting.

More from Warehouse Reporting